Barry P, easily two-thirds of the women in the world touch intact penises and allow penetration – otherwise the world’s population would by now be confined to the Muslim world, the US, the Philippines, South Korea, tribal Africa, Israel, outback Australia and eastern Polynesia. China, Japan and India would be deserted….

The research that claims to show no difference in sensitivity all has a basic fault – it ignores the foreskin itself.

Intactivists always seem to have the “wrong” demographics. If we’re not gay men (and therefore obsessed), we’re women (and therefore unqualified). Actually, the movement has its full share of straight men, some resentful of being circumcised, some grateful to be intact and wanting to share the blessing.

The bottom line is human rights: his body, his choice.

And I do wish we could lay to rest that old excuse about sensitivity. The research I’ve seen shows absolutely no perceivable difference, ……and no man circ’ed as a baby even remembers the operation, let alone any pain. Yes, I DO speak from experience! The hysteria over circumcision (usually led by women funnily enough) is, in my opinion, just ridiculous, considering vaginal cancer is caused by HPV, …and where does it live?
Love the piece BTW!
I may use your phrase!

A Jewish sage said that once a woman has tried an intact guy, she’ll never let him go, and given the gentle rolling action, the lack of fierce thrusting (because he’s got all his nerves and can feel better what’s going on), I’d say he had something.